“If you can’t even make a car of your own, why keep bashing? You are just using.” (Charles Ding Kuan Jian, 2009)
I start off this post with a simple quote from my friend… And I will begin with simple comparison about the engine used, and power output for all similar equivalent vehicles from all competing manufacturers.
1.5 Litre Class
Competing Cars | Honda City | Toyota Vios |
Engine Code | L15A | 1NZ-FE |
Engine Type | SOHC i-VTEC | DOHC VVT-i |
Configuration | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
Horsepower (PS) | 120@6500RPM | 109@6000RPM |
Torque (Nm) | 145@4800RPM | 141@4200RPM |
This is the long old rivals… Technically wise, the Vios with VVT-i is much more suitable in normal driving, with all nice power distribution over all RPMs. Real power and handling wise, Vios is no where to match the City. Specification wise also tells that 1NZ-FE inferiority being DOHC but such a lower output comparing to L15A. Both are good enough to offer what you need, provided you don’t really compare the built and features.
Competing Cars | Honda Civic 1.6 | Toyota Altis 1.6 | Proton Waja 1.6 | Proton Waja 1.6 Campro | Proton Waja 1.6 Campro CPS |
Engine Code | R16A | 3ZZ-FE | 4G18 | S4PH | S4PH |
Engine Type | SOHC i-VTEC | DOHC VVT-i | SOHC | DOHC | DOHC |
Configuration | Inline-4 | Inline-4 | Inline-4 | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
Horsepower (PS) | 125@6500RPM | 105@6000RPM | 102@6000RPM | 110@6000RPM | 125@6500RPM |
Torque (Nm) | 151@4200RPM | 145@4400RPM | 140@2750RPM | 148@4000RPM | 150@4500RPM |
From the specifications, the Altis 1.6 is quite the loser here with the VVT-i. While it still can offer a smooth riding, the power isn’t quite up to level, better opt for the Vios with better weight and power output as a 1.5. Another downpoint is with that already low 105 horsepower, it is only achievable @ 6000RPM which is very difficult 2nd gear onwards without Valve Lift and with only 4 speed Auto.
The next worse case is the Proton Waja Campro, as usual… The ever so and so Campro engine with torque dip around 2000RPM to 3500RPM which is crucial to normal cruising. Expect to either to drive under 2000RPM to stay in 2nd gear all the way from your house to office, or just drive normally and enjoy the “Torque Dip Effect” where you will be watching each and every car cutting off by your side, or else you can take what the Campro most good at, just rev all the way to your highest output, fuel gone, money gone. Wise choice? Proton and Proton lovers say yes.
Now we will be seeing the good old ordinary Proton Waja with the Honda Civic i-VTEC. For such an old engine by Mitsubishi, and only SOHC configuration without and fancy Valve Timing or Valve Lift, the power output is surprising good. Revving to near 2800RPM is all what you need to do normal overtaking and beyond, and watch the Campro still enjoying their “Torque Dip Effect” while you can cruise with maximum torque. The Civic however, comes with same power output and slightly higher torque than the CPS. Due to the R-series engine nature that is aimed for fuel efficiency, I am not comparing it with the CPS. I can only say that, same point with the City vs Vios that is, CPS inferiority with slightly lower torque but with a DOHC configuration.
The Waja CPS no doubt is the “most powerful” of all in this case. Driving the right way, it does give adequate fuel efficiency, or you can pull all the way for Fast And Furios : Malaysia.
1.8 Litre Class
Competing Cars | Honda Civic 1.8 | Toyota Altis 1.8 | Proton Waja 1.8 | Proton Satria GTi 1.8 |
Engine Code | R18A | 1ZZ-FE | F4P | 4G93P |
Engine Type | SOHC i-VTEC | DOHC VVT-i | DOHC | DOHC |
Configuration | Inline-4 | Inline-4 | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
Horsepower (PS) | 140@6300RPM | 132@6000RPM | 116@5750RPM | 140@6000RPM |
Torque (Nm) | 174@4300RPM | 170@4200RPM | 165@3750RPM | 181@3500RPM |
Well… A straight look… The F4P maybe does something good but then clearly not enough to stay in the class, or even worth comparing to Waja 1.6, just a slight gain in HP and Torque and with heavier DOHC, it won’t get any big differences.
Competing Cars | Honda Civic 2.0 | Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GT | Toyota Camry 2.0 | Honda Accord 2.0 | Proton Perdana 2.0 V6 |
Engine Code | K20Z2 | 4B11 | 1AZ-FE | R20A3 | 6A12 |
Engine Type | DOHC i-VTEC | DOHC MIVEC | DOHC VVT-i | SOHC i-VTEC | DOHC |
Configuration | Inline-4 | Inline-4 | Inline-4 | Inline-4 | V6 |
Horsepower (PS) | 155@6500RPM | 155@6000RPM | 147@6000RPM | 156@6300RPM | 148@6750RPM |
Torque (Nm) | 188@4500RPM | 199@4250RPM | 190@4000RPM | 189@4300RPM | 179@4000RPM |
The Civic 2.0 and Lancer all are to belong to the same segment. Nothing much can separate the Lancer with the ordinary Civic with almost same level of power output both with decent engine. Handling wise both are of its class as well. The only thing that ruined the Lancer is the not-so-well done CVT with Invecs-III. In normal terms, CVT should prevail over any gearbox in power band, but not in this one, Civic 5AT prevails this time. It is sad to see that with extra 11Nm of Torque, the Lancer can’t really catch up with Civic acceleration yet.
0 Responses to "It’s showdown"
Post a Comment